Time, space and poem
Time, space and poem
Regarding poetic creation, how to define it?
Is it a method of its part of the aesthetic itself?
If it’s aesthetics,
From this question, we can observe the world, the world of the poem. How is it related or defined regarding time, space and the poem?
For example a poetic element “there is the wind of the sea” and then how would this element be treated in the world of creation?
It is better to say that is the truth that “the wind of the sea” by itself, can you provide the poem itself?
If the world configures through “the wind of the sea”, can we say that it is the poem?
To deepen this I propose a title like “The Blue” and confirm how it would be.
This is example poem.
The blue
The wind of the sea.
The link between title and body of poetry, only these is it possible to construct poetry world?
The title “The blue” how to transform to poetic world?
With these elements poetic world appears only these elements.
We continue a little more of the analysis and in this case I do not propose the title so that understanding better.
The sea breeze, nothing more.
Also we are able to ask the same with this.
Is it possible to say this is a poem ?
Without a doubt, the verbal description is transformed into the categorization of the poem without any conditions.
However I believe that beyond the poetic intention there is something more of the truth regarding the element of the poem.
So what is it?
The poet has own and absolute world or rather the concrete world.
And this would be the primitive establishment when the poet expresses a phrase with the intention of creating a poem, and it is automatically established regarding the relativity between the poet and the poem.
The sea breeze, nothing more.
Without any doubts it is the poem because it established the relativity between elements that mentioned.
But the problem is the following when the mediation of the reader appeared.
For the reader, how would be considered this poetry?
This is a case that if the reader may accept as if it is poetry.
The sea wind, nothing more.
In here what is happen on poetic interpretation?
We can understand in this the accompaniment of the interpretive condition.
Because one can consider this is the poem instead for the other one could not understand what this is the poem.
Please be careful, how did the poem propose his poetry and how did relativity provide in this poetry?
By these relative elements the poem can be defined is restricted objective.
For the poet
The sea wind, nothing more
It is a concrete and definitive world since expressed.
With this element of relativity the poem and the relativity of the reader we can find the difference of the poetic interpretation.
So now we can summarize the following:
The poem consists of the combination with the concrete and definitive world, the abstract and not definitive world.
Thus we can say the poem is the combination of various forms of the world.
To end this short essay we have to consider aesthetics how it relates to these elements of the concrete and definitive world, the abstract and not definitive world.
There is no doubt that aesthetics is the synthesis of these elements because in this factor we put the value of aesthetics.
In any situation the primordial constructive of the concrete and definitive world, the abstract and not definitive world would be time, space and the poem.
Because the aesthetic appears in this the time, space and poem and comes from this.
8th May 2020 Tokyo
Ko Ohashi
Original y Spanish versión
“El tiempo espacio y poema”
Time, space and poem
Regarding poetic creation, how to define it?
Is it a method of its part of the aesthetic itself?
If it’s aesthetics,
From this question, we can observe the world, the world of the poem. How is it related or defined regarding time, space and the poem?
For example a poetic element “there is the wind of the sea” and then how would this element be treated in the world of creation?
It is better to say that is the truth that “the wind of the sea” by itself, can you provide the poem itself?
If the world configures through “the wind of the sea”, can we say that it is the poem?
To deepen this I propose a title like “The Blue” and confirm how it would be.
This is example poem.
The blue
The wind of the sea.
The link between title and body of poetry, only these is it possible to construct poetry world?
The title “The blue” how to transform to poetic world?
With these elements poetic world appears only these elements.
We continue a little more of the analysis and in this case I do not propose the title so that understanding better.
The sea breeze, nothing more.
Also we are able to ask the same with this.
Is it possible to say this is a poem ?
Without a doubt, the verbal description is transformed into the categorization of the poem without any conditions.
However I believe that beyond the poetic intention there is something more of the truth regarding the element of the poem.
So what is it?
The poet has own and absolute world or rather the concrete world.
And this would be the primitive establishment when the poet expresses a phrase with the intention of creating a poem, and it is automatically established regarding the relativity between the poet and the poem.
The sea breeze, nothing more.
Without any doubts it is the poem because it established the relativity between elements that mentioned.
But the problem is the following when the mediation of the reader appeared.
For the reader, how would be considered this poetry?
This is a case that if the reader may accept as if it is poetry.
The sea wind, nothing more.
In here what is happen on poetic interpretation?
We can understand in this the accompaniment of the interpretive condition.
Because one can consider this is the poem instead for the other one could not understand what this is the poem.
Please be careful, how did the poem propose his poetry and how did relativity provide in this poetry?
By these relative elements the poem can be defined is restricted objective.
For the poet
The sea wind, nothing more
It is a concrete and definitive world since expressed.
With this element of relativity the poem and the relativity of the reader we can find the difference of the poetic interpretation.
So now we can summarize the following:
The poem consists of the combination with the concrete and definitive world, the abstract and not definitive world.
Thus we can say the poem is the combination of various forms of the world.
To end this short essay we have to consider aesthetics how it relates to these elements of the concrete and definitive world, the abstract and not definitive world.
There is no doubt that aesthetics is the synthesis of these elements because in this factor we put the value of aesthetics.
In any situation the primordial constructive of the concrete and definitive world, the abstract and not definitive world would be time, space and the poem.
Because the aesthetic appears in this the time, space and poem and comes from this.
8th May 2020 Tokyo
Ko Ohashi
Original y Spanish versión
“El tiempo espacio y poema”
